Guide
AI for law firms, the complete guide.
AI for law firms is a wide subject, and most of what is written about it is either sales copy or scaremongering. This page gathers our whole library in one place, organised the way a firm actually meets the questions, so you can start wherever your firm is and read only what you need.
Every piece is written in plain language for small and mid-sized UK practices, starts from your duties as a regulated firm, and ends with a sensible next step.
Your duties and the regulator
Start here. Nothing about AI sits outside the rules you already practise under, and these pieces set out what the SRA and the courts expect.

The SRA and AI, what the rules require of you
AI does not sit outside your professional duties. It sits squarely inside them. Here is what the SRA rules require of a firm that puts these tools to work.

The SRA's rewritten supervision guidance
The SRA has substantially expanded its supervision guidance. A named authorised person must stay accountable for AI-assisted work.

Supervising staff who use AI in a law firm
Supervising staff who use AI in a law firm matters more, not less. Polished output can be wrong underneath, and the duty to check stays yours.

Keeping clients informed when you use AI
Keeping clients informed when you use AI is part of client care. Where a tool touches a matter, a little candour protects the retainer.

Marketing your firm with AI, honestly
Marketing your firm with AI saves real time. The SRA's rule that publicity must not mislead means you still stand behind every word it writes.

Mazur, AI and the question of conducting litigation
A Court of Appeal ruling on supervision leaves one AI question open, whether a tool that makes case decisions amounts to conducting litigation.

AI in court documents, the CJC's emerging line
The Civil Justice Council has signalled its view on AI in court documents. For professional drafting, your existing duties still carry the weight.

When not using AI becomes negligence
The UK Jurisdiction Taskforce says a professional can be liable for using AI badly and for failing to use it at all. What that means for your firm.

The judiciary's AI guidance, read for law firms
The judiciary's AI guidance tells judges how to approach these tools. Read closely, it also tells a law firm how the bench will read AI-assisted work.
Confidentiality and client data
The duty most easily lost with AI, and the one clients care about most. These pieces cover where the data goes and how to keep control of it.

Automated decisions, AI and your law firm
Automated decision-making moved from prohibition to permission with safeguards this year. What the reformed regime lets your firm build, and the duties that come with it.

Client confidentiality when using AI tools
Client confidentiality when using AI tools rests on one fact. Every prompt carrying client information is a disclosure, machine or not.

UK GDPR when client data meets AI
Putting client data through an AI tool is processing like any other. The UK GDPR applies in full, and a few questions keep you on the right side of it.

Moving client data across borders with AI
Many AI tools process data outside the United Kingdom. When client data crosses a border, the UK GDPR has something to say about it.

Retention and deletion when AI holds your records
Retention and deletion duties follow client data into any AI tool that stores it. If the tool keeps copies, your schedule has to reach them.

The confidentiality trap in AI note-takers
AI note-takers record client conversations and send them to a third party. The confidentiality trap is real, and a few checks keep you out of it.

Cyber security when you adopt AI
Cyber security when you adopt AI starts from a plain fact. Every new tool is another door into the firm, and a few basics keep each door locked.

When your AI can send email in the firm's name
AI assistants can now send email, book meetings and file documents in your systems. What a firm should check before granting write access.

ICO AI and data protection guidance for law firms
The ICO's guidance on AI and data protection maps every UK GDPR principle onto AI systems. Here is what a law firm should take from it.
Choosing and buying tools
The market is loud and the demonstrations are polished. These pieces give you a disciplined way to buy.

Choosing legal AI tools for the small firm
Choosing legal AI tools for the small firm is hard in a loud market. A short, disciplined process tells substance from hype before you sign.

The contracts to read before you buy AI
The contracts to read before you buy AI decide whether a tool is safe for a law firm. The demonstration sells it, the terms tell the truth.

The real cost and return of legal AI
The real cost and return of legal AI go well past the licence. The honest question is whether the hours saved repay what the change takes.

Multi-model legal AI, what your firm should ask
Legal AI platforms now run on several models at once. That changes how your firm should compare tools, read data terms and supervise the work.

GPT-5.6 goes public, what your firm does now
OpenAI has released GPT-5.6 to everyone after weeks of government limits. The capability jump is real. Your firm's duty to check and protect is not.

What clients now expect AI to do to your fees
What clients now expect AI to do to your fees is no longer guesswork. Deloitte's research shows the pricing pressure heading for every firm.

Professional indemnity and AI for law firms
Professional indemnity and AI now travel together. Your insurer has a view on how your firm uses these tools, and renewal is when it surfaces.
Using AI in the work itself
Where the time is won and the mistakes are made. These pieces cover the daily tasks and the checking that keeps them safe.

Where AI helps legal drafting and where it does not
Where AI helps with legal drafting, and where it does not. The skill is knowing which drafts to trust and which are a starting point only.

AI for legal research without the risk
A general chatbot is the wrong tool for legal research. A tool built on real law is a different proposition, used with care.

AI document review and disclosure for law firms
Reviewing a large set of documents is where AI can save the most time, and where a careless approach can do the most damage.

AI in conveyancing for the smaller firm
Conveyancing runs on volume and tight margins, which is exactly why AI is tempting, and why the duties around it need care.

AI in family law, sensitivity and safeguards
Family work is among the most sensitive a firm handles. AI can help with the load, but the data deserves particular care.

Stopping AI mistakes reaching your advice
Stopping AI mistakes reaching your advice takes one discipline. General models predict text, and sometimes they invent a case that never existed.

Verify before you file
Verify before you file is now part of the duty to the court. AI hallucination cases keep climbing, and a checking habit keeps you out of them.

AI hallucinations and who stays accountable
In Cork v Smith a firm misled the court through AI hallucinations. The ruling sets out plainly who stays accountable when AI produces the work.
Running the change in your firm
Adopting AI well is a sequence rather than a purchase. These pieces put the steps in order.

Writing an AI use policy your team will follow
A short, plain policy is the difference between a team guessing and a team knowing. Here is what a workable AI policy for a small firm contains.

Training your legal team to use AI responsibly
Training your legal team to use AI responsibly is what turns a policy on paper into habit. A tool is only as safe as the people using it.

Building your firm's AI roadmap for the year ahead
Building your firm's AI roadmap for the year ahead keeps adoption in the right order, duties first, one tool proved, then widen what works.

When your AI disappears for nineteen days
A capable AI tool vanished for nineteen days under export controls. For a firm that had built it into daily work, that is a continuity problem.

When your AI assistant works while you sleep
AI assistants now run in the background and from a phone. For a law firm that raises real questions about confidentiality, supervision and control.

AI and access to justice for the small firm
Used well, AI can let a small firm serve clients it could not afford to serve before. That is a quieter benefit worth naming.
The models and the market
You do not need to follow every release, but the big moves change the arithmetic for a small firm and the rules keep arriving.

AI providers enter legal, what your firm weighs
The AI model makers now sell into legal work directly and firms are signing partnerships. What a smaller firm should weigh before it ties itself to one platform.

Claude Sonnet 5, a new AI model for law firms
Anthropic has released Claude Sonnet 5, close to its top model in capability at a lower price. Here is what that shift means for a law firm.

Fable 5 and Mythos 5, AI models pulled and restored
Fable 5 and Mythos 5, Anthropic's top AI models, were suspended for nineteen days under US export controls, then restored. Here is why it matters.

The EU AI Act deadline that touches UK firms
From 2 August 2026 the EU begins enforcing its rules on general AI models. Here is where the AI Act touches UK law firms, and what to do.
Free download
A ready AI use policy template.
Rather than start from a blank page, take our AI use policy template and adapt it to your firm in an afternoon. It covers approved tools, confidentiality, checking output, telling clients and supervision, written in plain language for a small practice. Enter your email and we will send the download link.
Your firm
Not sure where to start?
Take the two-minute readiness check, or tell us where your firm stands and we will point you to the right first step, with no obligation.
Start with a conversation